Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Army Marksmanship Unit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus to keep following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 06:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

United States Army Marksmanship Unit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Article was previously deleted under CSD.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I think it is an important article, as they have sponsored many great shooters such as KC Eusebio, Max Michel and Daniel Horner. Sauer202 (talk) 17:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Source of many U.S. Olympians, prominent role internationally in shooting sports, well-known unit within the U.S. military. --- Evans1982 (talk) 15:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. As noted by the others, this unit is a highly significant entity within the world of competitive marksmanship.  Google searches reveal plenty of coverage, including this 2008 New York Times article about the unit and a similar 1985 piece from the Associated Press. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep A significant unit. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.