Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Gold Bureau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

United States Gold Bureau

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article -- almost a pure advertisement -- for non-notable company. The references are essentially press releases. accepted from AfC by now-blocked sockmaster  DGG ( talk ) 19:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom, sources must me from reliable and independent sources, they most have a certain depth of details, not just technical aspects. Eduemoni↑talk↓  19:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Once among 50 fastest growing firms in central Texas is the closest this gets to a claim of notability, and that is not close. It is a firm going about its business, no encyclopaedic notability; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 20:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per all of the above. Not a notable company. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.