Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States government electronic data provider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

United States government electronic data provider

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

My vote is Delete. I am behind the deletion of this article. User:ZabMilenko tagged this article for deletion claiming ''I do not see an actual article here. To be honest I don't know what this is about and I almost tagged with hoax. However, even if not a hoax there is nothing that constitutes a full-on article.''

I also propose its deletion because it appears to lack:
 * Being notable
 * References
 * External Links

I say the article is meaningless. --Sky Attacker (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete. I do not see a way to improve it as an article and there is nothing useful there, but I already voted when I added the prod. Zab (talk) 02:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ZabMilenko 10:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Delete. Polemic Neologism. --Pgallert (talk) 11:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete. No content in the article, just several wikilinks.DonaldDuck (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Delete - what little there is! Eddie.willers (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete. I have no problem with it. I think it would be useful to see a list of sources of electronically published information from the US government, but it makes sense that WP may not be the place for such a list. RayKiddy (talk) 05:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.