Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States of Whatever


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. –  Rob e  rt  00:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

United States of Whatever
This post really has very little if any content of interest. Some of the information is blatently wrong or simply conjecture or rumor. LordFate 20:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This appears to be a notable single. Any factual errors can be corrected. Gamaliel 20:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gamaliel.  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *  (talk)  20:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, has been featured in many pop-culture settings. ESkog | Talk 21:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Top 10 single here in Australia. Capitalistroadster 22:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the article, sadly, but please delete the single. It's 100x more annoying than crazy frog. Grutness...wha?  00:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wrong doesn't mean it should be deleted. --Andylkl [ talk! 15:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Song received a fair amount of air play, if I recall correctly. &mdash; RJH 17:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, I'm not a huge fan of articles on singles but I guess this passes. Stifle 21:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sure as hell got a lot of airplay around here. Although that has more to do with the record companies and less to do with the merits of the song.  --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 16:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.