Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States visa embargo against Iran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

United States visa embargo against Iran

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:OR or even WP:HOAX and clearly factually incorrect.There is no official Visa Embargo against Iranian citizens.Now between 2002 to 2009 Iranians were denied visa in some instances as per the article but there is no official embargo.It is tough for citizens from some countries to get visa to travel to others countries .For example afghanistan and somalia only 28 countries get visa on entry but that is not a embargo.Note Executive Order 13769 is different. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 08:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 08:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 08:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Delete The premise of the article is unreferenced and dubious. The article exists as a list of incidents where Iranians were denied visas, which is not a worthy article topic. Iran–United States relations and United States sanctions against Iran are sufficient for anything worth saving. --Jprg1966 (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Delete. After examining the skeletal article and others commentary on the article, I am skeptical of the claims of the article. desmay (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)