Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World College of South East Asia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clearly BEFORE wasn't followed, Also as noted below it being poorly sourced or worded is not a valid reason for deletion, WP:SOFIXIT applies (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 20:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

United World College of South East Asia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article cites only primary sources from the school website for the bulk of it's content with the only secondary source being used to confirm that a certain pupil attended the schools. A search for sources reveal no secondary source about the school itself but are rather about the actions of those who went to the school. It simply isn't notable enough and I highly suspect that the bulk of this article was written by the organization itself as a self-promotional material Zubin12 (talk) 02:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep This school is covered in the International Encyclopedia of Education in 1989, and in other reliable sources. The solution to the identified problems with this article is to edit it with the goal of improving it in accordance with our policies and guidelines. It is not a good idea to try to delete an article about a notable topic instead of improving it. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep High Schools are given great leeway in notability and School that is featured in Encyclopedia of Education is certainly out of its peers and notable. I will advise the nominee again to follow the advise on his talkpage. –Ammarpad (talk) 09:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Here's a source: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/united-world-college-halts-intake-of-singaporeans, and a reminder that AFD is not for deleting articles that are written badly WP:AQU, That stuff can be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egaoblai (talk • contribs) 20:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.