Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitnews.co.uk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Unitnews.co.uk
speedy deleted as non-noatable, but WP:CSD A7 does not extend to websites, so i have undelted and listed here. Notablity not clearly establsihed by the articel as it stands, so Delete unless notability established by verifiable sources. DES (talk) 01:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. No Google rank.  Traffic Rank for unitnews.co.uk:  810,508 .  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-17 02:22Z 
 * Delete unless notability can be established.--ragesoss 04:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. SycthosTalk 05:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fancruft. Incognito 05:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not just fancruft and non-verifiability that are of concern here. Another reason is given here. --JB Adder | Talk 13:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination, fancruft. --Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Acyso 20:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete only verified by the site itself --TimPope 22:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.