Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity Party of Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Unity Party of Canada

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

AFD was requested by IP, I'm submitting it in good faith for them. tedder (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

This "Unity Party of Canada" was never a registered political party with a certifiable level of support during the entirety of its three year existence. Not only that it is highly unlikely that sources will or can be used for the article as the Unity Party was never a serious political party. I do not believe it is worthy of an encyclopedia article. Following the link on the "way back machine" it is obvious that it was nothing more than an online discussion forum, never frequented by more than a dozen users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.55.244 (talk) 07:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC) tedder (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - This party never registered or actually engaged to run candidates. The press has take no notice of the party. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. The article says it all "At its height in 2001, the Unity Party had no more than 20 members". Nothing more than trivial mentions and [[WP:MIRROR. J04n(talk page) 04:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: If it gets kept, that unsourced bit about them "drifting" to other parties has got to go. The NDP is not, to my knowledge, seen as particularly nationalist.  - BalthCat (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The party and its website are hoaxes:  "Democracy is for people who don't trust each other".  Worth reading for the humor, though.  The Four Deuces (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.