Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Absolutism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Absolutism. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Universal Absolutism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is an essay and not an article -> NPOV, Style, no sources, and so on David Ludwig (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the phrase has some usage, but this essay is not sourced and can be safely deleted without loss of relevant information. no prejudice to recreation if enough sources found for the phrase (doubtful this is possible), but NOT from this articles creator.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Absolutism until sources are found. I don't think the same article creator would be a problem if he used sources; NPOV/style/etc are not a reason to delete. -- Explodicle (T/C) 17:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * well, yes, i do agree that the article creator could recreate an adequate article, but they would have to first learn how to write here, which at this point they dont know how at all. I would support a redirect as somewhat more appropriate (i apologize for often forgetting about the multifarious deletion types we have)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced original research. Edward321 (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.