Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Credit Rating Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  → Call me  Hahc  21  20:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Universal Credit Rating Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * (Traditional Chinese)
 * (Simplified Chinese)
 * (Simplified Chinese)

I declined a speedy on this article, but I'm nominating it for deletion as it is essentially new and has not had the requisite significant coverage for inclusion. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable topic. The creation of UCRG is a significant political move headed by the Chinese to redress the percieved imbalance in world credit rating agency ownership (i.e. US and European firms dominate). Chinese references now added to the article and there are plenty more out there. Philg88 ♦talk 08:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've found another source.It seems different from Philg's source in content.--180.155.69.97 (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of sources, also mainstream media, as the following source - Antonio nn (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * There are multiple sources out there but they don't necessarily need to be added to the article, they just need to exist (which is why I added the two Chinese search templates above). Philg88 ♦talk 17:06, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 07:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 07:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * keep A quick news search turns up significant coverage from major international news organisations. Maybe not the best sort of sources to base an article on as it's not on a news event but certainly enough to establish notability.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 22:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.