Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Day of the Jedi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deleted.  Sandstein 20:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Universal Day of the Jedi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Made up observance with no verified claims and no sources - Tiswas (t) 20:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * KEEP. It is a fact that this holiday has been celebrated: [| 13300 hits in google] [| and this] should be a prove about it. Even if it is celebrated only this year, i think the article should be kept just in case anyone in the future would like to know about it. Neologistic articles should not be deleted only due to a subjective POV of non-relevancy emmited by someone who doesn't know much about the issue.LeChimp 13:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only sources/links are self-published (blog, MySpace, etc.). HeirloomGardener 21:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --Whsitchy 22:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Entry is no different than and/or similar to others in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Geek_holidays - entry is also published in Star Wars wiki (currently listed on their front page as news) and in forums such as in these two examples: http://revision3.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6374 and http://emceesquare.proboards40.com/index.cgi?board=nothing&action=display&thread=1179926030&page=1. CGt2099 04:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - the article needs to stand on its own merit, not on that of other articles. Forums very seldom count as reliable sources, for the purpose of attribution - Tiswas (t) 10:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - In case more sources are found. Teo64x 06:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - In case more sources are found. 195.158.147.42 07:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC) — 195.158.147.42 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment I smell a sock. Anyone agree? Whsitchy 13:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Smells like a sock, sounds like a parrot. HeirloomGardener 15:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - My opinion could change if attributable sources came along, but my sense is that this would have to have been "celebrated" a few times to achieve notability -- GJD 12:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the event has no notability, I have been unable to discover anything other than blog and other wiki entries to support it. --Drappel 14:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Entry is similar to others in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Geek_holidays - entry is also published in Star Wars wiki http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Universal_Day_of_the_Jedi — 68.193.228.30 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete -- for lack of RS -- as blogs etc. don't count. Day just passed but nothing on Google news.  Though lots of sockpuppets seem to be interested in it. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 01:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Agreed, all the keeps are parrot votes and from an user/anon pair. Go figure--Whsitchy 04:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This is CGT2099 from above - I'm not logged in to show my vote was no "sock puppet" - 68.89.238.124 19:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some sources are provided showing coverage by reliable sources. Nuttah68 13:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources -- Whpq 16:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - only sources are myspace and digg. &there4; here&hellip;&spades; 18:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources. Stellatomailing 18:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.