Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Pantheist Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Universal Pantheist Society

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP. Not notable, no references. Hornet35 16:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Realkyhick 16:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm finding several mentions of the agency on Google in what appear to be reliable sites. This seems to be one of the few preeminent Pantheist organizations. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you post links to these "mentions of the agency"? --Hornet35 16:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it seems to be one of a few, or perhaps the only Pantheist organisation today. Lurker  (said · done) 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The Google hits I see are Web directories, not articles on the organization. Not notable. MarkBul 17:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I cant find any significant coverage either Corpx 17:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.V.E.i. (talk • contribs) 19:32, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Gosh, Hornet35, what was the sermon about yesterday? All my preacher talked about was the Beatitudes.  For the most part, your nominations appear sound, but I don't care for mass (no pun intended) nominations of a particular topic.  Mandsford 21:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep assuming there's a real source or two, which shouldn't be difficult. DGG (talk) 06:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve as one of the only pt societies that's lasted this long. Also, nom is a pretty egregious breach of WP:POINT. ornis ( t ) 06:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - hold on - please just tag with references needed. I'm having trouble keeping up with the number of AfD by Hornet35. I know he's a new user and enthusiastic to get articles correctly cited but has raised so many interrelated AfD and I (we ?) have so little time. Ttiotsw 08:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is referenced and seems to meet minimum criteria for notability.RandomCritic 15:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Pantheism ought to be represented. Sourcing could be stronger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanging Jack (talk • contribs) 15:17, August 28, 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.