Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Soul (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. A valid rationale for deletion is not present. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. The state of sourcing in articles is typically not a valid rationale for deletion as per WP:NEXIST. Articles that lack sources or are unsourced do not automatically qualify for deletion. However, an exception to this exists regarding entirely unreferenced biographies of living persons, which qualify for BLP prod. No prejudice against a speedy renomination that provides a valid deletion rationale. North America1000 23:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Universal Soul
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Re-afd'ing, was speedy closed as keep but nothing has changed to the references. This one has only utter garbage ones and practically counts as unsourced. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  19:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 19:39, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.