Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. —Cleared as filed. 02:50, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Universidad Cayetano Heredia
This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 13:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is indeed a real university and the best in the medical fields in Peru. I agree that it deserves expansion. I suggest to convert it into a stub. I can contribute to expand it substantially within the next few weeks.
 * Keep Real university. Badly needs expansion though.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  13:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but Move to Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia as listed in the article's opening paragraph (27200 google hits vs 200). Bobet 14:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC) -> It's moved now, so I see nothing wrong with either the new page or the redirect. Keep
 * Keep and move per Bobet. Universities are inherently notable. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 15:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep CalJW 22:00, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as part of the fight [personal attack removed]. The mere fact of something's existence makes it worthy of an article.  Kurt Weber 23:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this university's article. It's actually not too small as stubs go, either. Jacqui  ★ 01:46, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Dlyons. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 06:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, but I have a serious question to ask: if there is no stated reason for deletion, which is required according to the policy located at WP:DEL, then why are we even bothering to discuss this? I do not know if Crypticbot is a robot or not, but this nomination is still incomplete, and I do not understand why it is listed.  Yamaguchi先生 08:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Crypticbot is a bot (see its user page). I let it go ahead and list this since the nomination was clearly in good faith, as the article was a speedy candidate when it was tagged. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you Cryptic for the clarification. Can you please reprogram your robot so that it provides a valid explanation, as required by WP:DEL, next time?  This nomination was never properly completed by Crypticbot.  Yamaguchi先生 07:37, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as per Yamaguchi; no contest. Silensor 23:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please professor yamaguchi is right erasing this does not make sense Yuckfoo 00:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as this is now a full fledged article about a Peruvian medical university. Yamaguchi先生 07:37, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Move however is not a relevant university on Peru i think this medical university deserves an article.HappyApple 00:20, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously. Not sure what you meant there HappyApple, can you rephrase what you were saying?  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * What i was trying to say is just Cayetano Heredia University it was founded after Saint Mark's of Lima schism in 1960s and many former professors (most of them retired or with older methods for education such as scholasticism) (from UNMSM) give their lectures there, hence lacks of prestige and prominence on scientific investigation.HappyApple 01:28, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep and rewrite the bot to delete orphaned AFD noms, not list them. Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 14:49, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, why is this bot listing AFDs nominated and abandoned by anons? Anons can't even bring things to AFD. Any anon brought AFD should be summarily kept even if it's an article that would otherwise be deleted.Gateman1997 20:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.