Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universities medical assessment partnership


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 00:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Universities medical assessment partnership

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Sending WP:APPNOTE to (who removed prod) and  (who tagged this for notability). Boleyn (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I do not see what it wrong with this. If it were a category for the subscribing institutions, I would immediately want to delete it as category clutter, but it is a factual article.  I do not understand the merits of the map within the article which seesm to colour in the counties where medical schools are, not the locations of the schools.  It is not necessarily the NHS areas for which the relevant teaching hospitals are responsible.  They may (but do not necessarily) coincide with county boundaries.  The map should accordingly be removed as misleading.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Unsure but maybe keep simply because it seems acceptable - My searches found nothing with the best being this, this and this. I'd like to get some other users' insights before commenting further. SwisterTwister   talk  05:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.