Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universities medical assessment partnership (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Universities medical assessment partnership
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. I took it to AfD last year, but only two responses and ended in no consensus. I'm re-nominating to try to get a consensus, one way or the other, after eight years of being tagged for notability. Boleyn (talk) 11:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  13:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  13:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  13:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  13:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This med student's survival guide is about as close as I can get to signifcant coverage in a reliable source, but even that contains less than a handful of information. Other GBooks hits are merely passing mentions. There are more passing mentions in GScholar, but nothing at all in GNews, ergo: fails WP:GNG. - HyperGaruda (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.