Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Presbyterian Church (Seattle, Washington)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 08:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

University Presbyterian Church (Seattle, Washington)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet the WP:N/WP:GNG guidelines for organizations, largely unsourced ColonelHenry (talk) 07:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. It does not appear that WP:BEFORE has been followed. This is clearly a megachurch, and as such as significant coverage. Loads of results in Google Books, a couple of which I will add to the article. StAnselm (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete Mere size is unimpressive, and I'm afraid that I'm not finding anything much about the congregation or building beyond routine coverage which may be found about many churches. It doesn't seem to have attracted much in the way to notice for being as big as it is. Mangoe (talk) 13:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you really call this "routine coverage"? StAnselm (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per StAnselm. Many potential sources at GBooks discuss this church, its influential 1980s pastor Bruce Larson, the church's extensive mission focus, etc. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Arxiloxos. Extensive coverage in GBooks. -- 101.119.28.31 (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep article could be improved. But that's editing and not deletion.  WP:SOFIXIT.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.