Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Alabama in Huntsville varsity tennis team Playboy controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 22:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

University of Alabama in Huntsville varsity tennis team Playboy controversy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Per WP:BLP1E, this is a marginally notable model, and the article is all about one minor incident in her life. Was originally at Roseleena Blair, then moved to Expulsion of Roseleena Blair from the University of Alabama in Huntsville varsity tennis team by User:Mayumashu per "the notability of this matter is not her but her expulsion", then moved to this title by me because that title violated BLP (IMHO). Floquenbeam (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Let alone the poor sourcing and likely WP:BLP concerns, the claimed notability of this event to demand coverage by an encyclopedia is highly dubious. Pedro : Chat  21:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Article subject is not notable for one event per WP:NOTNEWS, and is not notable as an athlete per WP:ATH...she has not competed above college-level or participated in the Olympics. And this article title is somewhat misleading...the article is about one tennis player at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, not the whole team (which is where BLP comes in...)  Bobby Tables (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced BLP about an nn model/amateur athlete which until today was riddled with BLP violations. One of many college athletes who tripped over NCAA eligibility regs, receiving a flash of press coverage only because she was paid by Playboy rather than a local business or college booster. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely not news in any way at all. With the many variations on this article's title in the past, salting of this and past titles is highly suggested as someone seems to have something against this woman which highly violates WP:BLP.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a random athletic suspension, not an encyclopedic subject. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete One of the more extreme WP:BLP1E articles, and not even based on a notable one event. Johnuniq (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Person isn't article-worthy (WP:ONEEVENT), event isn't article-worthy (WP:NOTNEWS). A yawner. Tarc (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as clear WP:BLP1E (and FWIW not sure that this title is any better than just Roseleena Blair). ukexpat (talk) 16:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * My theory was that this title wouldn't show up as high in the results if "Roseleena Blair" was Googled; I admitted somewhere (ANI?) that this article title sucked. I toyed with renaming it Delete this Article, but figured someone would complain I was poisoning the well... --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Someone please snowball close this as a delete and put it out of its misery. – ukexpat (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.