Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Information Science and Technology "St. Paul The Apostle"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

University of Information Science and Technology "St. Paul The Apostle"

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article states they have 375 students, which is not a university. Many of the claims look too much, and none are verified. From their own web page the number of faculty is very small. Making a Beowulf cluster is not notable. More significant coverage is needed, this fails almost everything. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Policy based input would be helpful. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and North Macedonia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Technology.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment State universities and colleges tend to be notable, although this is a comparatively minor vocational one. It appears reasonably likely that WP:SOURCESEXIST, but searching in Cyrillic is difficult for many of us. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Undecided. Universities are normally notable, although even by North Macedonian standards this one appears to be quite small (the other public universities in North Macedonia for which we have articles each have more than 10 times as many students as this one). Yes, searching in Macedonian is difficult for us here, but the article in the Macedonian Wikipedia isn't that much better. At worst, though, redirect to List of universities in North Macedonia rather than deleting this article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have generally kept universities founded by statute. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Based on what policy? The Banner  talk 18:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Seconding the policy question. Also, as I stated in the original nomination, I could not verify the claims -- maybe someone else can. For instance, I am doubtful about all the claimed collaborations with universities many times their size, the 14 BA & MA degrees, the ranking. I could not verify any of these. It is easy to write on a web page, but normally we look for verifiability, WP:N. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Based on WP:CONSENSUS over many AfDs. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I am asking for a policy. Not for a circular reasoning. The Banner  talk 23:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Yup, that policy would be WP:CONSENSUS! -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No, I am still asking for a policy that says specifically that we are keeping "universities founded by statute". WP:CONSENSUS does not state that. And saying that we keep universities because we kept universities in the past because we kept universities in the past etc. is a circular reasoning. Not based on any policy. The Banner  talk 17:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep -- the top level polytechnic of a nation that was founded by the national government is a notable act in itself. There are numerous US institutions with fewer undergraduates (Caltech) or even 1/10th of the total number of students (Deep Springs College) that are notable, so the size of the institution isn't a determining factor; the significance of the institution to a nation's identity is a glimpse at the importance to a people. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Two points:
 * Please check your numbers, you are way off. Caltech has close to 3 times (1023) the number of undergrads per year, to compare to the total number of 357 for both BS & MS, plus Caltech admitted 1440 grads. https://registrar.caltech.edu/records/enrollment-statistics
 * You ignored the key point -- essentially nothing on this Wikipedia page is verifiable. The Deep Springs College page has 37 sources, plus stacks of other material that verifies notability.
 * I politely request that you demonstrate their notability if you want to defend them. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Neutral If we are to evaluate only based on the inserted references, then this fails every notability guideline, but if sources in foreign (local) language exist, and are promptly introduced, then things could change. I feel it's necessary that someone with proficiency in the local language performs some searches and shares the results. X (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed Ldm1954 (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to List of universities in North Macedonia until proper sourcing can be identified. JoelleJay (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete with no prejudice against recreation if sources become available. I conducted some searches in Macedonian but failed to locate significant secondary source coverage. Right now we are doing no service to our readers by having an article unsupported by sources making various dubious claims. AusLondonder (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Redirection to List of universities in North Macedonia is an excellent alternative to deletion.  I'm on the fence as far as independent notability, leaning very very slightly on the keep side, essentially per the argument of . Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Simply stating we have kept other articles is not an argument. AusLondonder (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Weakish keep. I got some help from one of our students here with language.  There's an interview with the vice-rector, which we probably can't use for facts, but which I think contributes to notability.  Substantial piece in Makedonsko Sonce on a potential reorganization .  There's coverage in national newspapers related to a labor disagreement , and in context of national university organization  (for example, lots of stories of the latter type).  Lots of coverage in Ohrid News, for example .  I found perfoming Google site-searches for "Универзитетот за информатички науки и технологии" to be helpful.  Overall, I'm seeing enough consistent coverage over time for a reasonable notability case.  As other editors have been saying, this is as one would expect for one of a small number of state universities.  I am not impressed with the comparison with CalTech, but I think it might be helpful to compare with e.g. the University of Maine School of Law: a small technical school that is nonetheless of regional importance and wider interest, and that is appropriate for encyclopedic coverage. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't mean to connect reputation to Caltech -- and Deep Springs, Harvey Mudd, or University of Main School of Law is a better analogy to what I meant as my point that size of institution in itself isn't a determinant of notability. Thanks for the better comparison. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist for consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Pinging as regulars at WP:WikiProject Higher Education, their input could help build a consensus. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry but my expertise is in US higher education. And with seemingly most or all of the available sources not being in my only language I'm afraid that I can't be very helpful here at all. If pressed, I would lean slightly toward keep on the strength of the evidence that you cited in your own "weakish keep" !vote. But if there aren't enough sources available for an article to be written by volunteers in English Wikipedia then I would certainly understand a "delete" result. ElKevbo (talk) 00:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * (Found this via ping above) Keep per Russ Woodroofe (trusting the validity of the sources, as I don't speak Macedonian).  Sdkb  talk 14:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.