Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Toronto Mississauga Students' Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Brandon (talk) 20:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

University of Toronto Mississauga Students&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I really believe this organization exists. However, I can find no evidence that this organization passes the notability guidelines or the organization guidelines. This does not appear to meet the basic inclusion criteria. The article contains only self-published websites as references, as does a raw Google search. Google News turns up a smattering of news articles where the name of the organization pops up in a sentance here or there, but there does not appear to be any substantial coverage in any of these cites, just a brief mention. Jayron  32  04:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jayron32-- The LegendarySky Attacker 04:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG, totally non notable outside the university. LibStar (talk) 08:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Individual students' union do not generally pass WP:ORG. Possible redirect to the University article Ohconfucius (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No historical impact. Abductive  (reasoning) 16:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Other SU's with Wiki articles include Algonquin Students' Association, Brock University Students' Union, Carleton University Students' Association, McMaster Students Union, Alma Mater Society, Ryerson Students' Union, Central Student Association, Your Student Association, Student Federation of the University of Ottawa, Federation of Students, University of Waterloo, The University of Western Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University Students' Union, York Federation of Students, and many others. Peter on Blocks (talk)
 * Each of these is decided on its own merits. We are aware of the existence of other articles on possibly non-notable associations, and you could help us be researching the ones you have found, and if they are not notable, nominating them for deletion as well. Abductive  (reasoning) 00:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There maybe, somewhere else in all of Wikipedia, at least one other article which is not currently nominated for deletion but could be. The existance of that article does not excuse this one of its shortcomings.  -- Jayron  32  03:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —TerriersFan (talk) 18:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.