Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Washington College of Engineering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to University of Washington. The other articles mentioned should likely be WP:BOLDly redirected. The Bushranger One ping only 03:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

University of Washington College of Engineering

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Department of a university. Does not seem notable enough (or notability is not established in the article) to warrant a separate article. Suggest deletion and add mention to the main university article. Biker Biker (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect to University of Washington as per College_and_university_article_guidelines as there is no evidence that this department has individual notability. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect into the university's page, college specific. Shadowjams (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom. We need to look at these other departments too, like University of Washington College of Arts and Sciences, University of Washington School of Dentistry, University of Washington Information School, University of Washington School of Public Health, etc. It looks like a series of perfunctory articles has been generated using boilerplate from the University catalog and marketing brochures, and padded with run of the mill lists of programs, non-notable deans and faculty, etc. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:Run of the mill for why this sort of reference data is non-encyclopedic. There's no reason to have readers come to Wikipedia for things that are just as easily found on the Universities own web sites. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed; department-level articles should go unless there is demonstration of specific notability (on which the bar is high: I've seen top 10 in the world mentioned elsewhere as an appropriate department-level criterion). These probably need a distinct follow-up nomination though. AllyD (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom. Yworo (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.