Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Univocalic

Univocalic was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep.

Dicdef Cutler 13:10, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Inaccurate dictdef, too (it should be "unambiguous," not "ambiguous"). I can think of a specialist manner in which the term is used (in Bakhtin's discussion of heteroglossia), but I don't think it deserves to be broken free.  Geogre 16:45, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep assuming the definition as a type of poem is correct. Expandable. anthony &#35686;&#21578; 02:05, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but cleanup and expand. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:32, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.