Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unnikrishnan Nair Mannath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Unnikrishnan Nair Mannath

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable person. Only two references are give. One is to his own website. The other is to Money 2.0 Conference, which after checking the speakers show he was featured there. However, no real idea if that confers notability. There may be a WP:COI in that the creator,, may be involved in the company. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I find no news sources and only two hits in Gsearch, this feels very PROMO. I don't see enough coverage to keep the article. Oaktree b (talk) 23:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, United Arab Emirates, Delhi, Kerala, Rajasthan,  and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no secondary source coverage and the article reads extremely promotional.Sk1728 (talk) 12:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete There could be COI as the user created account 8 days ago and he created the account only to create this page (16 edits, totally on this article only) and there are no any reliable sources as far as i can see. TheSlumPanda (talk) 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:FAILN References not sufficient to demonstrate notability, article also reads like potential self-promotion, or at very least a long way from WP:NPOV. Jamietw (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.