Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uno Hoffmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Uno Hoffmann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable artist; no works in permanent collection of a major museum; no extensive (or any) critical studies of their works.  DGG ( talk ) 18:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No non-trivial third-party coverage to support WP:BIO notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Works in permanent collections In response to DGG's comment above - I have contacted the Gulbenkian, Moderna Museet, and the Art Museum of Estonia to confirm that each of these continue to hold works by Hoffmann within their permanent collection. What kind of evidence do I need to add to the article for this? Will respond to non-trivial third-party coverage on a separate line. Kutbil-ik (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Non-Trivial Sources I have located more sources from newspapers and otherwise concerning Hoffmann's work, and added these to the article and to the talk page.Kutbil-ik (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The two sources you added are press releases, which do not count as reliable sources. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - trivial coverage not enough to pass Wp:GNG and doesn't seem to have met WP:ARTIST— UY Scuti Talk  08:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now at best as there may simply not be enough yet. SwisterTwister   talk  17:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.