Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unraveling a mystery of space


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. This looks to be a WP:NOT essay at best and even if this topic could warrant an article, it'd require a complete re-write. I have no problem with anyone e-mailing a copy of this to anyone requesting a copy, but this just isn't what Wikipedia is for. I'm closing this early since I can't see it ending any other way. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Unraveling a mystery of space

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not sure if this is a hoax, a random essay, or just a poorly written article on an encyclopedic topic related to Hindu theology, but regardless of what it is, it's so poorly written that I can't even understand where it's going. The title doesn't help, because we don't need articles about unravelling space mysteries (surely adherents of these doctrines, if they're real, wouldn't call them "unraveling a mystery of space"?), while some of the contents make me question whether it's real: is there really a religion of sound waves, for example? Nyttend (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't quite merit speedy deletion per a variety of criteria (G1, G11, A11) and may or may not be original research, but it's an unencyclopedic mess all the same. -- Finngall  talk  13:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, there probably are some good historical sources behind this but the piece is so much an essay that the only option is to rub out and wait for someone else to start it again. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, unclear, PoV/vanity article - Arjayay (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Ditto Arjayay's comments --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Whatever this is, it's not an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.