Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unrealised Projects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 17:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Unrealised Projects
Seems to be a NN advert. Prod failed. 0 incoming glinks. The author(s) of the article are the only contributors and own the company. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 13:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment/clarification - article notes founding by Sam Ely and Lynn Harris, article created, and prod removed, by . &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 15:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as it fails to claim any nobility and no sources are provided - the edit summary when prod removed was a claim of being well known in the art community - this claim needs to be verified. also fails WP:ORG.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NOT soapbox. Cute recursiveness: Unrealised Projects is itself an unrealised project. The authors claim it is a "project which is widely known in the art world", yet 13,000Ghits with only 1 apparent unique hit, is not notable per WP:NN. "Sam ely" scores 471 Ghits. "Sam ely"+unrealised scores 19 Ghits; "Lynn Harris"+unrealised scores 19 Ghits. It appears that he may be a lecturer at University College London. Other than unrealisedprojects.org, only art directory re-title.com and ucl have listings for them. Ohconfucius 15:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Zaxem 08:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.