Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unreasonable Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In most cases with only one !vote I'd relist, but given the promotional tone of the article and the fact it was created by an editor now indeffed for undisclosed paid editing, that's a delete. If this can be rewritten neutrally and GNG-compliant, by all means it may be undeleted/recreated. The Bushranger One ping only 09:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Unreasonable Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

most of the sources comes from Forbes's contributors(not editors), and I'm in doubt about these sources are primary sources/written like an advertisement. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Not seeing anything that establishes a WP:GNG or WP:NCORP pass. Likely WP:PROMO piece. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.