Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unreleased Dannii Minogue songs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Unreleased Dannii Minogue songs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable unreleased songs. Relying on ASCAP and BMI, royalties collection organizations, for sources, does not prove notability. Article is full of original research. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - nothing but blogs, fan sites, and trade websites, no independent and reliable sources. Can you find anything else? Bearian (talk) 14:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Scientizzle 15:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * delete nonnotable. unreleased is unreleased hence something not very notable. Otherwise someone will try to make money on them. Its notabilities must be strongly established in reputable sources. Laudak (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per consensus that unreleased songs generally aren't notable. This sources nothing but blogs, fansites and ASCAP listings, none of which are really reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 18:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I must dispute the characterization of ASCAP's website as "not a reliable source". BMI and ASCAP are considered definitive sources in terms of songwriting and publisher information, as used by the industry. I'm still debate whether to support this article or not as I think there is precedent here, but I certainly will not support its deletion by in any way suggesting that ASCAP is not a reliable source! 23skidoo (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ASCAP is reliable, but it shouldn't really be used as a source anyway. ASCAP can't tell you what stage a song is in development, only the copyright owners. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 10:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.