Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsafe sexual practices


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 11:28, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Unsafe sexual practices
Not suitable for an encylopedia. Not useful information. Rubbish Alex Bartho 03:16, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see why it's not suitable, the information needs some cleanup but it is useful. Ifnord 03:54, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Suitable topic for entries and (potentially) very useful information.  Jtmichcock 04:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep although article needs some work. Herostratus 06:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: if this is to be kept, it needs objective definitions of how a practice qualifies as safe or unsafe, with statistics and references for proof about what is actually dangerous. -- Kjkolb 08:22, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: 1. Mistitled (should be Unsafe sex. 2. Already covered in Safe sex.  3. Because of the title, it is POV.  Let me explain this last: These are practices that qualify as "unsafe sex," but they are not practices that are unsafe inherently.  Inasmuch as "safe sex" and "unsafe sex" are both compounds that refer implicitly to HIV/AIDS, they have lost their literal meaning of "safe" and "unsafe" + "sexual intercourse."  4. In this form, it's rather a Wikibooks entry.  To be encyclopedic, it would need, really, to indicate sources, history of the scheme, implications of the campaigns, etc. Geogre 13:31, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and transfer useful info to sex. --YixilTesiphon 17:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Effectively a mirror image of Safe sex. --Last Malthusian 18:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Geogre. KingTT 18:13, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * VoiceOfAll closed this debate as no consensus after a single day. Since that is improper, I have reverted. Also, delete, fork. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 23:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. This page needs a lot of cleanup but it contains what is very useful information in these days. --Kurt Shaped Box 00:06, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete User:Ejrrjs says What? 00:11, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This is almost certain to be searched for at safe sex. Replication here is silly. D e nni &#9775;  01:09, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge antyhing useful and redirect so people who look for this actually find something. - Mgm|(talk) 10:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Geogre is exactly right.  Eusebeus 14:43, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, especially per Geogre... and Denni. Jacqui ★ 15:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect redundant article to Safe sex. &mdash; RJH 16:16, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. -Sean Curtin 01:36, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge Why not have a section in safe sex that outlines what are considered the riskiest practices? Sethie 07:11, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful per MGM. Kappa 12:54, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has a lot of potential. Voyager640 05:43, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.