Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unschooling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep -- Curps 06:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Unschooling
Does not seem like word?--Cr0w bar 00:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a neologism, but it's a hot topic lately.  --Allen 00:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Amcbride. Royal Blue 05:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely a real phenomenon, and a belief system.  moink 00:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - er, this is getting to be a pattern, CrOw bar... Perfectly suitable article, I've heard of this idea a lot. Lots of references in article. Camillus (talk) 00:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Invalid reason for deletion. SYCTHOS talk  01:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep neologism, sure, but most articles in this encyc. were once neologisms... Mi kk er ... 02:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete unless it can be demonstrated that this is actually a term-of-art in the references cited. Otherwise its notability has not yet been established. Savidan 02:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Ter e nce Ong 03:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Remohol 03:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strongest possible speediest keep evar. Most definitely legit.  Coined by John Caldwell Holt, a world-renowned educational theorist (that may be a neologism right there, but it sounds cool).  In fact, I actually unschool myself.  -- Rory 0 96 05:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - valid article, I don't get why it's up for deletion -- Tawker 06:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, has been around forever. Daniel Case 06:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep -- S iva1979 Talk to me 06:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.