Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unstoppable (2010 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Unstoppable (2010 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Explicitly fails WP:NFF as production will not begin until September per. Contested prod. PC78 (talk) 09:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 09:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - It is true that future films are very rarely notable, however this is one of those exceptions. The film has already received coverage in over 100 reliable sources: .  On that basis, the film would still be notable as a failed project even if it doesn't ever get finished.  It isn't a sequel to anything and multiple very notable people are involved so there is no good play to merge the material. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and further source. Yes, though WP:NFF tells us a film that has not entered production should not have an article, it also allows/expects consideration of the occasional exception and the use of common sense. As ThaddeusB points out, this one qualifies as one of the exceptions to that rule, as it has enough coverage to qualify for inclusion even were it to be never made. I will myself be adding sourcing in a few hours if others have not beaten me to it. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * More news on the production front.. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep If it got notable news coverage, that makes it notable.  D r e a m Focus  20:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball Keep - reasonable nom at the time, but notability now clearly established following the usual excellent improvements of MichaelQSchmidt. FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.