Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unstoppable force, unmovable object

Unstoppable force, unmovable object was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Unstoppable force, unmovable object
Bad physics, bad humor. Denni &#9775; 23:39, 2004 Dec 6 (UTC)
 * original research, kind of. Transwiki or something. Kappa 00:32, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: College dorm room experiments with herbal consciousness adjustment.  Geogre 03:45, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: well put, Geogre --Whosyourjudas (talk) 03:47, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: DCEdwards1966 04:12, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamaliel 04:16, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Dude. Did this guy just blow my friggin' mind? no. delete. -R. fiend 07:48, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Where did the other electrons and protons come from? Where did the other object come from? Is the unstoppable force bringing along another umovable object with it? Appreciate the humor, though. &mdash; [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker &#2470; (talk)]] 08:23, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * But, like, what if the immovable was fixed in the fourth dimension? Maybe then this the universe would explode and this article might not get Delete-ed... Woah...   &mdash; Asbestos | Talk 16:19, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. A paradox! a paradox! a stale and hackneyed paradox!/We're fair and balanced just like Fox/But this one smells like last day's socks. If it weren't for the fact that it is always phrased as the irresistable force and the immovable object I'd suggest a redirect to Paradox. They were discussing that sort of stuff in dorm rooms in the nineteenth century, too, BTW:
 * "That's mere juggling!" vociferated the boy," That's merely the same kind of toy-shop brain-trick you gave us out of Greek philosophy yesterday, They said there was no such thing as motion because at every instant of time the moving body had to be somewhere, so how could it get anywhere else? Good Lord! I can make up foolishness like that myself. For instance: A moving body can never stop. Why? Why, because at every instant of time it must be going at a certain rate, so how can it ever get slower? Pooh!" He stopped. He had been gesticulating with one hand, which he now jammed wrathfully into his pocket. &mdash;Owen Wister (1903), Philosophy 4


 * COMMENT What happens when an irrestible force meets an immovable object? Hopefully a better article. The current article at the very least has the wrong title, and doesn't English specify immovable? 132.205.94.190 23:44, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm pretty sure I've seen this somewhere before. Most likely a copyvio from some book, although I can't remember which one offhand.  JYolkowski 02:59, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * BJAODN, anyone? Bearcat 06:35, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.