Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled 9th studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 09:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Untitled 9th studio album

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable future album, fails WP:CRYSTAL.  TN ‑ X - Man  17:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Untitled future albums should be speedily deleted.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree in principle, but if you look at Criteria for speedy deletion (specifically number 7), albums are not eligible for speedy. Sigh.  TN ‑ X - Man  17:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. That's a blanket statement that doesn't apply to all cases. If an album has been announced and there is sourcing, but for whatever reason it has no title as yet, then it satisfies notability. It's no different than the fact we had an article called Bond 22 for a long time before Quantum of Solace was announced as the title. I'm not saying this particular article justifies notability, but it shouldn't be a blanket cause for deletion. 23skidoo (talk) 21:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - My apologies, I should have been more specific. I agree that it's not a general policy. I actually checked WP about once a day for weeks before Guitar Hero II came out to see if any new tracks had been announced. I meant that I agreed that one-line articles that only mention that an album is supposed to come out should be speedied. Sorry for the mix-up.  TN ‑ X - Man  21:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, for now. Good to know they're getting back in the circuit, and if they're talking about it on Rockline, then it's probably for sure - but there need to be more sources of info, other than a radio interview session. As such, no prejudice to future recreation. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. If kept, this article title needs to be disambiguated as it is far too generic. 23skidoo (talk) 21:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * More like it needs to be renamed. =/ -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 02:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC and TPH's Law.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.