Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Album (Despina Vandi)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Untitled Album (Despina Vandi)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

There is only one article sourcing the album and all that it says is that there is one coming out; no date, name, etc. I think it is far too early to have an article for this album and the article body, though mostly sourced, is just background information about recent songs that may or may not even be included on the album. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. + WP:HAMMER. Imperatore (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The source from the new album came out from the same Despina Vandi. All the sources are officials. Also, all the new sources are included to the background. Finally, the songs are going to included to the new album of Despina Vandi as they belong to Phoebus by music and lyrics. This is a reason that the song Iparhi Zoi was not included to the compilation of Heaven for Despina that was named Greatest Hits 2001–2009. --Teo628957 (talk) 17:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no source that says that Iparhi Zoi will be on the album though. Many artists release stand alone singles. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment You're an irresponsible editor reverting all the changes I made, because I had other valid grammar and copy-editing revisions. Furthermore, the recording of Iparhi Zoi belongs to Heaven. It was sold as a digital download and marketed by Heaven, through the creation of a music video and release to radio stations. Heaven owns the phonographic copyright of this song, meaning they own the recording. Foivos, as a writer, owns the music and lyrics, but he does not own the recording. Either way, the issue here is that you're reverting my entire edit and not just about Iparhi Zoi, as well there is no proof in the sources provided that Iparhi Zoi will be on the album. Foivos' forum is fan speculation. This article also fails WP:NALBUMS & WP:HAMMER and should be deleted right away. Imperatore (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons stated above and in nomination. Greekboy (talk) 00:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * As I can see your problem is the single Iparhi Zoi so I will not include it to my article. All the other sources is associated with a source. As you can see there is no other unsource information in my article. --Teo628957 (talk) 07:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete (reasons mentioned above). I've worked on this article myself, trying to lift it up a bit, however, I never heard of the WP:HAMMER rule. Having read that, and bearing that in mind, I can't say anything else then 'delete'. I think the next (or perhaps only) question should be: is it ging to be deleted at once, or is there going to be a timeframe? The latter gives people a chance of finding new/ more sources, and/ or perhaps Despina/ Fivos/ Spicy Effect will release some new/ more info (although I think that seems very unlikely). If the time has run out, and no additional sources/ info could be found, than I recommend saving this article's page somehow (in Word or Pages for example), and sort of start over again when WP:HAMMER is not of relevance anymore. Another idea might be to  merge parts of this article in the article of Despina Vandi. But whether speedy deletion, deletion after some time, or merging the article; WP:HAMMER is the guideline, and I think no one can deny the fact that this article fails greatly in that department. --Robster1983 (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I suppose we can Redirect to the Vandi's page, per WP:HAMMER & WP:NALBUMS, so that what when more information becomes available, it can be retrieved from the history. I did not bother suggesting a redirect in the first place because I figured that the one or two pertinent paragraphs in the article could easily be re-written in the future, with better sources, when new information becomes available. Imperatore (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER because the sources talking about the album are not reliable and even if they were, they do not have enough on actual release date, title, etc. However, the fact that the album is in the works is a different matter, and that can be covered for now at Despina Vandi. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with a crystal hammer. 'Nuff said. B.Wind (talk) 23:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.