Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Brad Anderson project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Untitled Brad Anderson project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON article about an unreleased film. As always, Wikipedia does not keep an article about every film that can be minimally sourced as having entered the production pipeline -- with extremely rare exceptions for hypernotable films on the order of the Star Wars franchise, most films are not notable until they have been released, and thereby received reviews from reputable film critics. Just because the director has a WP:BLP does not automatically mean we need to rush-job a premature article the moment he announces that he's working on something new — if you don't even know a title or anything about the plot yet, let alone an actual release date, then just hold your jumpy horses. Bearcat (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - the film passes notability guidelines. Let's be honest the only reason this is being discussed is that it doesn't have a proper title, but that is not a reason to delete the article. As it passes NFF, it should remain - we'll get a title soon enough, and the page can be moved accordingly. Somethingwickedly (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * KeepThere are some good sources here to help show its notability with a notable cast'dorector, and it passes NFILM. Perhaps most importantly is that the fact that principal photography has begun. SIt is a shame that it doesn't have an official title yet, but that isn't a reason to delete supported by any policy. It passes notability guidelines, ergo it should remain. Cindlevet (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 23:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.