Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Indiana Jones film


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Untitled Indiana Jones film

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Plans for a future film should not have an article until reliable sources show that principal photography has started, per WP:NFF. This is a high profile film but is not scheduled for release until 2019 and is still in the planning stages. Meters (talk) 23:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Let the discussion of WP:FFEXCEPTIONS begin. Meters (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. I would say merge any useful info to Indiana Jones (franchise) but it looks like most of it is already there. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 23:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Move to Draft-space until such time that the article is ready. Fortdj33 (talk) 01:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Aoba47 (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a film that is 3 years from its release date. Those have a tendency to not happen, so even that is debatable. More over the title actor who has the main role in 74. He probably will live to be in the film, but that is far from gauranteed, which could scuttle the whole project. Until we have reliable evidence that principal photography has comencedwe should not have this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Besides TOOSOON, also a violation of WP:NOT (WP is not a crystal ball).  Until principal photography begins, there is always the risk that this could go into development hell. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Indiana_Jones_(franchise). It's too soon for an article since filming hasn't commenced and right now all we have is just talk. The film could be made or it might not be - until filming commences we won't really know for sure. We could probably leave the article history behind so that if/when filming does start, we'd have something to pull from. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see any point in redirecting it. If we had a firm title it would be a viable redirect, but not with the current title. No-one is likely to ever search for "Untitled Indiana Jones film. Meters (talk) 07:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is already a perfectly adequate location for this at Draft:Indiana Jones 5, for a film that has not even gone into production. This article's creator may contribute there until it is ready to move to the main space. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 23:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Written in a fannish, conversational style of inappropriate WP:TONE, it's also filled with "rumors said this" and "Spielberg denied that." This is like something you'd see on rumor-mill fan site, not in an encyclopedia. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per above (WP:SNOW) and WP:HAMMER. This is literally two summers from now. Until we know at least some of the cast and the title, I'm inclined against it. Even imdb lacks the 411 on casting director, supporting cast, or set designer(s). Bearian (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay toosoon!. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.