Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Kelly Rowland album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Incubate. Would be a delete on the merits, but since it seems likely sufficient information will be available soon, I'm going to incubate it at Article Incubator/Kelly Rowland Shi  meru  21:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Untitled Kelly Rowland album
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Album that is going to be released in 3 months, no title and tracks listing confirmed yet ×º°”˜ `”°º× ηυηzια  ×º°”˜ `”°º×  17:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Keep. THe Album has been titled, has a set realeased date, and three confirmed singles

Why delete it?

 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NALBUMS: no title and an incomplete track list. This should be covered at the artist's article at least until those two are verified.  Cliff smith  talk  20:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep, *UNTRUE. The album is to be called "Kelly Rowland". It has a release date of September 14th 2010. It has 3 singles confirmed, 2 U.S.A singles "Grown Woman" & "Rose Colored Glasses". It has the Europe, Aisa, Austraila 1st single Guetta produced track "Commander" which has already hit top 10 in the U.K & Ireland. It is doing very well across Europe and she has promoted it everywhere. There are offical covers, Official Dates, Offical tracks confirmed & Official Title.


 * THE PAGE STAYS IMO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.8.93 (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't talk about the single Commander, it doesn't matter if it charted in several places, but the album hasn't a tracks listing yet, so it fails WP:NALBUMS..and it's too early, I think it shouldnt be added before the 1 September.  ×º°”˜ `”°º× ηυηzια  ×º°”˜ `”°º×  14:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

* Delete motivations above  ×º°”˜ `”°º× ηυηzια  ×º°”˜ `”°º×  14:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nominator comments, there is not enough information to warrant a detailed enough page. There are not enough credible sources etc. It doesn't have a cover, track listing or confirmed release date - just media vaguely reporting September 2010. By the way i striked Merynancy's vote because by nominating the article you automatically vote for its deletion. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, too early for this... most of the article is information simply about when the singles were released and not much about the actual album. CloversMallRat (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC


 * Keep, No it hasn't got an official tracklisting yet, That might not even be posted until a week or 2 before the release but she did just throw a litening party a few nights ago, Which means the album is complete and promo is starting. The source is below about the party where they played 6 songs that is confimred to make the album "Grown Woman", "Rose Colored Glasses", "Shake Them Haters Off", "On & On (The Sound)", "Forever and a Day" & Heaven On Earth". If you check Rap-Up T.V (url below) there is a interview with Kelly herself about the production of the album, Which producers she has worked with, The sound of the album ect.... If you check her official website you will find there is a release date of the album and also the 3 singles. Another link below is of an interview just last week where Kelly talked more album the album including the title, producers, dates ect... What more sources do you need than from KELLY herself. The only thing missing is the tracklisting & the cover. She has been doing promo for the single "Commander" and the album all over the U.K and alot of radio stations in the U.S. She has been interviewd on Perez Hilton about the upcoming album, She is also just been confirmed to perform at this years B.E.T Awards. This era has already began and people are intrested and want information!! Thats what wikipedia is for right, To inform people? If this was Britney, Rihanna, Gaga or Beyonce the page would be up for months. The relase date is less than 12 weeks away.


 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E989Mr-sW0U&feature=player_embedded
 * http://www.honeymag.com/2010/honeymag/listening-session-recap-kelly-rowland/
 * http://thatgrapejuice.net/2010/06/hot-shots-kelly-rowland-album-listening-party/
 * http://kellyrowland.com/
 * http://kelly-rowland.net/2010/06/album-title-confirmed-kelly-rowland/ Posted by 92.4.89.66


 * Note that i have striked the unreliable sources. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


 * [The anonymous users can vote????You should discuss about this, it would be better if only users registred at least one month ago and with at least 50 edits should vote..too easy to hide behind an Ip address..] And answering to 92.4...... in my opinion and in other people's opinions, these informations aren't enough, and for the registred and concrete users who voted this page should be deleted, and 12 weeks are TOO MANY!!!!! ×º°”˜ `”°º× ηυηzια  ×º°”˜ `”°º×  19:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Comment: Look, Wikipedia's guideline about music notability (WP:NALBUMS) says: "Generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label." Now, since this deletion discussion began, the title has apparently been confirmed. But the track listing is still incomplete. There is already information about this album at the artist's article, which is where it should remain until the track listing is complete. As far as "Britney, Rihanna, Gaga, or Beyonce" are concerned, WP:NALBUMS also says "an unreleased album may qualify for an advance article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it," "However, this only applies to a very small number of exceptionally high-profile projects." There's about two paragraphs at this article presently. It can't really stand on its own just yet. Someone could WP:INCUBATE this, though, if so desired. Cliff smith talk  19:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


 * comment dont worry the number of votes cast doesn't affect the outcome. its the quality of the opinions give. so far IMO there is no substantial support or suitable argument for keeping the album. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.