Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Schulman/Joost project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 09:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Untitled Schulman/Joost project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON article about an unreleased film. As always, Wikipedia does not keep an article about every film that can be minimally sourced as having entered the production pipeline -- with extremely rare exceptions for hypernotable films on the order of the Star Wars franchise, most films are not notable until they have been released, and thereby received reviews from reputable film critics, and a small bit of initial casting announcement coverage is not enough to make it a special case yet. Just because the directors have WP:BLP articles does not automatically mean we need to rush-job a premature article the moment they announce that they're working on something new — if you don't even know a title or anything about the plot yet, let alone an actual release date, then you need to wait until you do know those things before a standalone article becomes warranted. Bearcat (talk) 23:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - the film passes notability guidelines. Let's be honest the only reason this is being discussed is that it doesn't have a proper title, but that is not a reason to delete the article. As it passes NFF, it should remain - we'll get a title soon enough, and the page can be moved accordingly. Somethingwickedly (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep A film that has actually been shot, with references to casting and production, and movies and plots are sometimes kept underwraps, and shot without titles. Vmars22 (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep There's lots of really good sources here to help show its notability with a very well known cast, and it passes NFILM. Perhaps most importantly is that the fact that principal photography has begun (and indeed finished). Cindlevet (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll just add that the fact it doesn't have a title is irrelevant; that doesn't mean the project isn't notable, and no policy suggests you need one before creating an article. Cindlevet (talk) 23:09, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.