Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Trey Edward Shults film


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Salvio giuliano 22:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Untitled Trey Edward Shults film

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:TOOSOON article about a film in the production pipeline, not yet reliably sourced as the subject of sufficient production coverage to exempt it from the principal notability criteria at WP:NFILM. As always, the "future films" section of NFILM is not an automatic "every film that enters the production pipeline is automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article right then and there" pass -- it's for films that generate a very large volume of production coverage that marks them out as special cases of significantly greater notability than the norm, such as Marvel or Star Wars films, while most films are not notable until they're actually released and getting reviewed by professional film critics. But this just has a couple of stray production and casting announcements, which is not enough coverage to deem it a special case of greater notability than other as yet unreleased films -- and both the fact that we don't even know a title yet, and the fact that I can't even get it out of the container-only because we don't even have a confirmed genre for it to be recategorized to yet, both mean it's too soon for us to have an article about this yet. Even if we sometimes permit articles about films prior to release if they have sufficient coverage, we should still never start an article about a film before we even know a title or a genre. Bearcat (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft. Per nom, it's too soon. Deadline said " production of the film began on February 2023", that does not necessarily mean principal photography.  Even if it did, there is only one source really for this, the initial announcement from Deadline, the others are just a reprint of that source. Draft it for now.   Mike   Allen   20:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft. Per nom, TOOSOON.  // Timothy :: talk  11:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft. ONLY because of its limited sources. Otherwise, as I stressed on Jenna Ortega's Miller's Girl, it would be notable enough to include in the main space.TheMovieGuy 15:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft - as per above, definitely WP:TOOSOON. Onel 5969  TT me 23:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft - If it's coming, you'll be able to get it. Just not enough info at the moment.KatoKungLee (talk) 01:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify: WP:TOOSOON per comments of the nominator and others. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Draft per above clearly WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.