Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Web Series About A Space Traveler Who Can Also Travel Through Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Untitled Web Series About A Space Traveler Who Can Also Travel Through Time

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no indicia of encyclopedic notability for this recently produced web-series. bd2412 T 14:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, as per USA Today, who noted it as some of the best web tv in 2012 (here). Might be thin, but it does indicate some notability. There is a mention at Huffington Post as well, but they print anything. Enough to keep? I dunno. At a minimum, it should be merged back over to the Community article, either about the season in which it came up or to the series article itself. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as coverage by reliable third-party sources appear to push this across the verifiability thresholds. In addition to the sources in the article, there's coverage here, here, here, here, here, and beyond. - Dravecky (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The sources that are anything more than borderline are only discussing the web series in the context of Community (where it is an in-universe gag) or Doctor Who (of which it is a parody). bd2412  T 15:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per above!, Do something useful instead of nominating NOTABLE articles! Davey 2010    Talk to me!   19:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If it is notable, it is on the very borderline of it. As for your suggestion that I "do something useful", I would invite you to look over my last four-hundred thousand edits on this project and decide for yourself whether I have done anything useful here. Cheers! bd2412  T 15:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good deal of secondary sources. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.