Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Web Series About a Space Traveler Who Can Also Travel Through Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. nomination withdrawn  DGG ( talk ) 19:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Untitled Web Series About a Space Traveler Who Can Also Travel Through Time
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be more or less an attempt to gain free advertising or publicity. I don't see any notability in the article or the references. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The nom says that they don't see any notability in the article or the references, but it only took me a few minutes to find these reliable sources:


 * Attention 'Community' fans: 'Inspector Spacetime' is real
 * Web Series Created Based on Community's Inspector Spacetime
 * Inspector SpaceTime trailer spoofs Doctor Who
 * Best of TV on the Web in 2012
 * Upcoming Web Series Borrows Much From Community’s Inspector Spacetime
 * 'Community's' Inspector Spacetime, Travis Richey, Producing 'Untitled Web Series About A Space Traveler Who Can Also Travel Through Time'
 * NBC nixes Inspector Spacetime
 * Watch the first episode of the Inspector Spacetime webseries that can’t legally call itself Inspector Spacetime
 * Doctor Who parody hits second episiode

A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 05:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. This was kept at AfD a little over a month ago under a slightly different title. --Michig (talk) 06:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge and redirect to List_of_Doctor_Who_parodies. I can certainly understand Ad Orientem's concerns, as most of the sources I found mention the series' initial legal issues and its launch. There isn't much coverage in reliable sources as far as reviews go. There are tons of blog hits, but few that could probably begin to be considered a RS. However there is just enough here to where it just scrapes by on notability standards, although I also think that this could be relatively well summed up in the page for the Doctor Who parodies. It does certainly merit a mention somewhere. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * However, considering that this was just up for AfD, this is probably a bit too soon to re-nominate. Since I just edited the article and voted, I'm not sure if I could close this off or not. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 
 * I was unaware that this had so recently been debated on AfD. Although I still don't like it, I will withdraw my AfD nomination or change my position to a very WEAK KEEP solely out of deference to the recent adjudication while respectfully disagreeing with the decision. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh, it happens. I've opened up AfDs before where I found that the article was at AfD and kept not a month prior. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. czar  &middot;   &middot;  06:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.