Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unusual number combination


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Unusual number combination
Trivial non-topic, this exact phrase is not in common use, article doesn't say anything that coincidence or mathematical coincidence can't say much better -- Aim Here 15:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to coincidence Ruby 16:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Quote: "Many computers use unusual number combinations in binary code, which simply consists of many 0's and 1's." - utter nonsense! Camillus (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per CPMcE, or Redirect to coincidence per Endomion. --Andy Saunders 17:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Camillus (talk). --Kinu 18:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redir per Endomion/Ruby. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need for such an article. Paul August &#9742; 02:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom and Camillus.  No redirect as article title is not notable.  --C S (Talk) 10:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with superstition and innumeracy, nah, just Delete. --M @ r ē ino 14:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.