Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unweave the Weave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Interstate 35E (Minnesota). Eddie891 Talk Work 00:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Unweave the Weave

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Almost entirely sourced to government websites, most of those press releases, as well as 1 SPS. While construction projects can be notable, this one seems run-of-the-mill. Also borders on POV in certain instances. Rschen7754 00:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Minnesota. Rschen7754 00:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to I-35E - It does seem run-of-the-mill, but there seems to be some lasting coverage from the Star-Tribune regarding the section's use as a testbed for variable tolls (e.g. this 2021 article and this 2016 article).  Sounder Bruce  00:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge information to relevant articles. The interchange project is not notable enough for an individual article but the information can be mentioned in the articles about the roads that meet at the interchange.  Dough   4872   00:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge per above comments Jack4576 (talk) 01:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to the history sections of Interstate 694 and Interstate 35E (Minnesota), though some of the information is already present in the Interstate 694 article. It could be added to the I-35E article.  In general, I don't think there's a lot of notability for completed construction projects in Minnesota, since I don't regularly see news coverage on projects that have been finished.  The I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapse and reconstruction is the level of enduring significance, since it raised awareness of similar fracture-critical bridges, but I can't see the point of having separate articles for every state construction project. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per Elkman. Admittedly (as one who loves designing highway exchanges for my geofictional ventures), this is as well-written and organised as AFD candidates get. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 22:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.