Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpGo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

UpGo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found no significant coverage for this application. The first reference is unreliable and the second reference is a dead link and leads to a website called City Rover. SL93 (talk) 02:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I confirmed (and marked) a couple dead links in the article and poked around through the various Google searches. I couldn't find reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  The closest is the Krueger blog but that's just not good enough for me or the guidelines.  Msnicki (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Little to no coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG; no reliable indepedent coverage. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 23:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.