Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up North (book) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Up North (book)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was previously deleted at Afd, but DRV determined that the new sources presented in the course of the AfD were not properly considered. The concern expressed was lack of notability as demonstrated through reliable sources. I am relisting the discussion per the consensus at DRV but have no opinion of my own at this time. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 'Keep. The sources in the article, plus others found by Google News and Google Books, demonstrate notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Previous closure was premature. Clear notability established by sources. 23skidoo (talk) 05:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep on the basis of the material demonstrated above. DGG (talk) 00:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.