Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up yours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Up yours
Not worthy of a sub stub in my opinion. Could easily be merged as well.  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *   (talk)  03:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Created by a vandal, all of whose edits were creation of vandalism and personal attack articles (now mostly deleted). -- Curps 03:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * All? I can count only 1 previous article, 3 edits total on 2 articles. Hardly qualifies as a vandal. Oh, and considering the other one was a user talk, its really an incorrect assertion.  Just the same, it's already in wiktionary, so delete. Zordrac 05:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and Curps. PJM 03:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Up Yours, Vandal! Croat Canuck 04:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definition belongs on Wiktionary and is indeed already there. --TantalumTelluride 05:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Mine's already full up there. Duplicate material and a dictdef. Geogre 17:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, though I would really like to know what "other uses" it has. D e nni &#9775;  05:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.