Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upasana RC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Upasana RC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. Refs are affiliated sources, advertisments or press release. Mothing that identifies notability. Fails WP:GNG. Would have been better as a draft going through review when these issues might have been identified before abruptly transitioning into mainspace  Velella  Velella Talk 07:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but mainstream newspapers are considered as reliable sources right ? Deccanchronicle is a mainstream newspaper. Published Wiki pages of the movie have the actor listed as well. I may be wrong here , can you please let me know if these are not considered as reliable source as wiki guidelines lists them as reliable source . Chiraag7 (talk) 08:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Reliability depends on context, Chiraag7. The three pieces cited from Deccanchronicle are firstly obvious press releases, as opposed to genuine newspaper articles, and secondly they don't help with notability, as they are primarily about other subjects, and only mention Upasana in passing. And other Wikipedia pages are never reliable sources, I'm afraid. Bishonen &#124; talk 08:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC).
 * Delete or move to draftspace. Bishonen &#124; talk 08:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC).
 * I agree to your concern, but all the actors pages that exist are based on the some article being printed . All actors pages that exist have the same problem, i am not taking about big names, but the small ones, eg "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aanchal_Munjal" or "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chetan_(actor)#References" these pages exists without any problem , they have the same references. i can show you many more pages like that on wikipedia . I am not sure how you differentiate between genuine newspaper article and press release, the articles are about movies and they mention about the cast. If you say wikipedia pages are not reliable , then why are all these references validated . I mean no offense , i am just trying to understand what exactly are you looking for ? Chiraag7 (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Draft for improvement through WP:AFC as most of the text is not referenced and the pageant link is a dead link. Only referenced material should be included. However, she has had prominent roles so should be notable in due course Atlantic306 (talk) 13:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your input, that pageant link seem to have shifted to a new domain , i have corrected the same. Also i have added one more article from the "The Hindu" which is about her and also mentions that she has done 5 films so far. I think that newspaper is reputed enough to confirm the same. Let me know your inputs on the same . Chiraag7 (talk) 04:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete an obvious promotional effort, supported by sources that are obviously promotional in nature. 104.163.148.25 (talk) 06:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify quite notable, only not well referenced. L293D (☎ • ✎) 19:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.