Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper Saint Clair Forensics Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask?  15:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Upper Saint Clair Forensics Team
Page has been speedily deleted twice; however, the talk page argues that these were erroneous, and makes some very forceful claims of notability. As such, I think it merits the full AfD treatment - who knows, perhaps it's keepworthy. What say you, brethren? DS 14:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete or Speedy again under A7. The talk page says that they are a successful high-school debating team, and I have no reason to doubt that.  I congratulate them on doing well in their competitions.  However, individual school's student groups at the high school level are simply not encyclopedically notable, and keeping this "just to be nice" would set a very dangerous precedent.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, if it is indeed a previously deleted article. The article should not be re-created without the author(s) going though the WP:UNDEL  -- Buck  e  ts  ofg ✐ 15:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Having nominated them twice for speedy deletion (once for A7, once for G4) I strongly support this nomination. ClarkBHM 15:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete recreated content   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  15:34, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as seemingly obvious G4; can an admin verify that nothing has changed other than the creator's comments on the talk page? Appropriate channel is discussion at WP:DRV, not a continuous cycle of recreating the article.  Kuru   talk  15:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete on its merits (or lack of them), so there will be no question. An individual high school debate team is not notable. Fan1967 16:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe the third time's the charm? Darquis 22:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CSD:G4. -- ReyBrujo 07:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A7. The reason the author gives makes is clear it is a vanity page. Ted 15:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a good and informative article. I think the rest of you are haters. : ( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.8.81.250 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 3 May 2006..
 * Delete Per Nomination. --Holy Cows 22:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Unless highly notable, they are minors and need privacy more than publicity (visitor)
 * Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  23:27, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.