Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). It's unclear whether or not the nomination and !vote following the nomination are based only upon the sources within the article, or if additional source searches were performed. Regarding the !vote following the nomination, "nothing convincing" comes across as possibly only being based upon sources in the article; it's an open-ended rationale, and is ambiguous. Note that per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is based upon the availability of sources, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. North America1000 15:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Upstar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. The sources added do not meet Wikipedia's standards. The article text acknowledges as much, noting that the company has "low brand recognition", ie. is not notable. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 12:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  14:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  14:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as a somewhat newly started company with nothing convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  21:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.