Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We have consensus that this company is not notable. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Upstar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, lacking significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The article text acknowledges as much, noting that the company has "low brand recognition", ie. is not notable. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 21:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and this should've basically been deleted at the first AfD as no one contested and I am accurate with saying there's still nothing for solid independent notability, regardless of whether someone disagrees with that. This is only still a few years old (2011) and none of this in any way suggests it's solid for independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  22:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Insufficient notability. Just corporate advertising. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete - no notability. Tom29739 [ talk ] 19:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly unnotable. &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.